We exposit: 

A blow in counting of the NPP supporters, the worst-case scenario in Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant blocks.

The myth of safe nuclear power plants is dead for good. In this technique suffered from the beginning under a huge weakness of the concept but no one wanted to admit. Even the opponents of nuclear technology have never been argued. Now, once more, this concept shows weakness as uncontrollable catastrophe:

Unlike other thermal power plants is used, in nuclear power plants fissile material as an energy supplier. The energy released during nuclear fission heats the heat medium to high water temperatures. Over a pumping cycle, this heat is transmitted via heat exchangers to a second water circuit . The result of the steam pressure drives turbines. Now the mechanical energy is converted into electricity with a generator, which is finally brought on by high voltage transformer, thus transferring the losses to consumers remain at a minimum. Insofar as the technique is that provided with all sorts of "safeguards", the average consumer as the "safest technology," touted and sold. With appropriate effort you can achieve even limited seismic safety. That did not do enough, we now see in Japan.

But not only earthquakes can cause accidents, but also storms, freezing rain, solar flares and sudden load changes in power consumption. The crux of the concept of nuclear power is not the technology alone, but that the energy generation nuclear fission is very slow. It takes days and weeks until the reactor is critical, ie the chain reaction is stable and it takes many hours if not days to shut down the chain reaction, until the temperatures are manageable.

The incidents come spontaneously and unannounced, but from the outside. Now you can quickly switch off (while away from the nuclear power), the generator, transformer, turbine, but not the reactor! It produces more heat, which can now be converted not more, and removed, since a suitable buffer, which could absorb the heat energy is provided at no nuclear power plant, is not on the whole earth! Therefore it builds up extreme heat in the fuel rods and in the cooling medium. It is the first weak link, because the water decomposes above 750 ° in hydrogen and oxygen, it arises explosive gas, which escapes from the safety valves on the inner reactor and immediately (by cooling down) is back and this combines back to water by hydrogen-oxygen explosion. This destroyed the reactor building. If the lack of cooling water is not immediately replaced,  the rest heats on and creates further explosions. Since the extremely high temperatures is able to soften even the thick steel shell, these containers also threatens to explode.

  Extracting the fuel rods, the mechanisms no longer work and as a consequence of the meltdown threatened with total disaster for a long time.
 
As extensively reported, none of the campaigns tried, to halt the meltdown, had success. Finally, the time window to take countermeasures is extremely short. But because of the very sluggish behavior of the nuclear fission reactor and the few possible ways to stop it, almost every little incident turns into a disaster.

Therein lies the fundamental weakness of the concept of nuclear power plants. That is like a timebomb, of which we have more than 430 on the earth!

The simple coherency in the economy:

If the conjuncture raises or fails is determined by approx. 40 mio. employees and not by the politician or charitable entrepreneurs. People are always scarred by reading about crisis by the media, so a lot of people are getting careful concerning their money; the consequence is the realisation of a crisis.

Because if you buy fewer, the less will be produced and for this, less employees are used = more unemployment.

This is something for the media in order to flesh out their bad news with numbers. An effect which continues like a snowball. But there is no person who explains the simple coherency.

You should expend your money majoritarian; otherwise you endanger your own working place.

Bear the year 2006 in your mind; it was the year of the World Cup. In Germany the spirit was untroubled; hardly bad news regarding the business activity in the media, the nation was in shopping mood. The spirit continued up to autumn 2008 and the business activity boomed.

Than the financial crisis had been born, or more precisely, the crisis had been discovered. Particularly American bancs had made false speculations, they had coined new financial businesses like a mobster so that they are able to work with billions of $ and € in unsafe businesses. It is supposed that a lot of credits were given to people without securities, but nobody controlled whether there were milliards which disappeared via bogus credit. Instead of making responsible all participated bank employees for this situation, the appropriate governments had seized the arised debts. Now these are common property and must be compensated by the nation.

This is a big story for the medias; a new horror scenario about which can be reported! At the beginning people are still unsteady about the consequences of this financial crisis regarding the economy, but now people are sure, because the important people are sitting at the control buttons of the economy and they react as the majority. Given that a lot of people expend hesitantly their money, but they bring it to the banks, you can say that the cashes will be filled rapidly.

As you have seen, the permanence shouting of the media had been realized in 2009. In autumn there were the Bundestags elections, this brought a change of the coalition partners, but no better times. The better times begun during the soccer world champion chip in South Africa, as the German team enthused the German nation, as it played self. The result is that in consequence of the enthusiasms the buying power reached new highlights which were not influenced by the “conjuncture measurements” of the government. Nevertheless, the politicians tried to robe themselves concerning the regeneration of the conjuncture as their earnings but at the same time they try to obtain more money from the citizen.

“To dig deep into the pockets of the citizen” is no foreign word for the big energy suppliers; they practise it with all impudentness. They invoke on the EEG and claim that the costs of the EE are so high. This is completely false, in order to see that, you have only to look at the profit margins of the energy giants.